Guide · Agent skill
How to use the Reference Originality Audit agent skill
Updated · written with AI from the project's own documentation and checked against our catalogue data
The Reference Originality Audit is an agent skill that makes Codex check a website or digital experience against the reference pages, screenshots, copy, images, videos and code you supply. It is aimed at agencies, studios and developers who want a documented review of possible copying before launch. After this guide you will know what the skill does, how to install it, how to ask for an audit in plain language, and what it needs to run.
Quick start
- 1Download and unzip. Download the skill ZIP from the page and unzip it into ~/.claude/skills/ or a project's .claude/skills/ folder.
- 2Or upload in the Claude apps. In the Claude apps, go to Settings → Capabilities → Skills and upload the skill.
- 3Gather site and references. Collect local copies of the site and the reference pages, screenshots, copy, images, videos or code you want to compare against.
- 4Ask for the audit. Describe the task in plain language and name the reference folder or files so the agent knows what to compare with.
- 5Optionally run the helper. Run scripts/build_evidence_inventory.py with Python 3 to surface exact matches, reused filenames, text overlap and repeated numbers as leads.
- 6Review the verdict and fix plan. Read the verdict and red-flag table, check the access gaps, and apply the prioritized fixes.
What is an agent skill?
An agent skill is a folder of instructions and supporting files that an AI agent loads when a task matches the skill's description. This skill's folder contains SKILL.md, a rubric file, a Python helper script and an agents/openai.yaml file.
The skill does not run by itself. The agent uses it when your request matches what it is for, such as comparing a site with its references.
What the skill makes the agent do
The agent builds a registry of the materials you supply, inventories the current site and its history, and compares it category by category: text, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, structure and motion, and history. Every candidate red flag must cite an exact location on the current site and an exact location in the reference material.
Findings are called originality risks, overlaps or red flags. The skill is written to avoid declaring legal plagiarism from visual similarity alone, and it separates facts from inferences. Where evidence is missing, the report says so instead of marking the area as passed.
The report opens with one verdict, such as Clear in checked scope, Changes recommended or Block release, followed by a red-flag table ordered by severity, a category pass list, history findings, access gaps and a prioritized fix plan.
- Compares current output and repository history against your references
- Rates findings by severity and explains the evidence for each
- Proposes concrete fixes such as rewriting copy or replacing images
- Lists what it could not verify
Install the skill
Download the ZIP for this skill from our page and unzip it. For a personal install, place the folder in ~/.claude/skills/. For a single project, place it in that project's .claude/skills/ folder.
In the Claude apps, you can instead upload the skill under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
- Personal: unzip into ~/.claude/skills/
- Project: unzip into the project's .claude/skills/
- Claude apps: Settings → Capabilities → Skills, then upload
Prepare your materials
Before you ask for an audit, gather local copies of the site and the reference materials. The skill is designed to work against a supplied reference set, so an audit with no references is not what it is for.
Local evidence captured when the brief was written is preferred. Live reference URLs are optional and are used only to fill gaps, because pages may have changed.
- Local copies of the site source and, if possible, built output
- Reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, images, videos or code
- Git history for the repository, if you want history searches
Trigger the skill with natural requests
You do not need special syntax. Describe the job and point the agent at your files. Mention the references explicitly so the agent knows what to compare against.
The skill's description covers requests to compare site output with reference pages, capture packs and copy, and to raise red flags and propose fixes.
- Check this new client site against the references in ./refs for copied copy or images before launch.
- Audit the current homepage and our git history for assets copied from the inspiration pages.
- Compare the built site with the reference screenshots and list red flags by severity, with fixes.
Run the evidence helper (optional)
The bundled script scripts/build_evidence_inventory.py scans local files and finds exact-file matches, suspicious basename reuse, normalized text overlap and repeated number tokens, including historical matches. It needs Python 3. Its output is a set of leads for human review, not a verdict. The agent fills in the command with real paths; the skill's template uses placeholders for the site root, reference paths and an output file.
- Requires Python 3
- Writes results to a JSON file you choose
- Uses local files only; the skill lists no network use
python <skill-dir>/scripts/build_evidence_inventory.py --site <site-root> --reference <reference-file-or-directory> --output <temporary-output.json>Read the result and act on it
Start with the verdict, then the red-flag table. Each row should show the current-site location, the reference location, what overlaps and what differs. Blockers and high-severity items are the ones to fix first.
Fixes are meant to replace the copied element. Recoloring alone is not treated as a fix for copied identity, copy, media or composition. Check the report's list of unverified areas before you treat a result as complete.
- Verdict: Clear in checked scope, Clear with low-risk similarities, Changes recommended, Block release or Blocked by missing evidence
- Fix plan: prioritized, with replacements for copied text, images, assets, videos or structure
What people use it for
- Agencies checking a new client site for accidental copying before launch
- Teams documenting an originality review of a site built from inspiration references
- Developers reviewing a repository for leftover copied assets or text, including in its Git history
Frequently asked questions
How do I install the reference originality audit skill?
Download the ZIP for the skill from our page and unzip it into ~/.claude/skills/ for personal use or into a project's .claude/skills/ folder for one project. In the Claude apps you can instead upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
What do I need to run the audit?
You need local copies of the site and the reference materials. Python 3 is needed to run the bundled helper script, and Git on the command line is needed for history searches. Live reference URLs are optional.
Is the skill free to use, and what is its licence?
The source lists the licence as MIT. The source does not state pricing, so check the directory page for any cost information.
Does the skill give legal opinions or confirm plagiarism?
No. The skill is designed to avoid declaring legal plagiarism from visual similarity alone and explicitly does not give legal opinions. Its output is not a substitute for a lawyer or formal IP review.
Does the skill use the internet?
The listed network use is no. It works on local files you supply, and it can run its helper script on them.
How does it compare with other originality or plagiarism checkers?
The source does not compare it with other tools. It is specific to comparing a site against supplied references across text, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, structure, motion and Git history, and it requires those references to work.
New agent skills, repos and AI tools — every week
The best new skills and open-source projects, the fastest-growing repos, and one free prompt. Five minutes to read. Unsubscribe anytime.
Our verdict
Use this skill if you are an agency, studio or developer who needs a documented, evidence-based originality review of a site or repository against references you already have. Pick something else if you need legal clearance, or if you have no reference materials to compare against.
Download the skill