oh-my-claudecode vs planning-with-files
Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.
Open source · MIT
Multi-agent orchestration layer for Claude Code, installed as a plugin or npm CLI.
Open source · MIT
A file-based planning skill that keeps AI coding agents on track across resets and crashes.
The short answer
Choose oh-my-claudecode if you need…
- Developers already using Claude Code who want multi-agent workflows
- Teams experimenting with parallel AI agents on coding tasks
- People who want a prebuilt autopilot command for building features from a short description
- Users comfortable with Linux or macOS-style terminals and npm
Choose planning-with-files if you need…
- Developers running long multi-step tasks in Claude Code or Codex CLI
- People who lose agent progress when the context window fills or is cleared
- Teams wanting a plan that lives in the project as plain markdown files
- Users of agents that support the Agent Skills standard
Side-by-side
| oh-my-claudecode | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dev tool | Dev tool |
| Price | Free and open source | Free and open source |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 40.5k | 27.8k |
| Setup difficulty | Intermediate | Beginner |
| How you get it | Install with a package manager | Install with a package manager |
| Main language | TypeScript | Shell |
| Last code update | 4 days ago | 6 days ago |
What each one is
oh-my-claudecode
oh-my-claudecode (OMC) is an add-on for Claude Code, Anthropic's coding assistant. It adds commands and workflows that coordinate multiple AI agents working on a task in parallel, such as planning, building, and QA stages. The README describes it as aimed at making Claude Code usable with little setup, though the exact behavior of each workflow is documented on an external site rather than in the portion of the README provided.
planning-with-files
This is a skill for AI coding agents that stores a task plan, research notes, and progress log as markdown files in your project. Lifecycle hooks re-inject that planning context so the agent can pick up where it left off after /clear, context compaction, or a crash. The README says it works across 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard, with native plugins for several hosts including Claude Code and Codex CLI.
Best for
oh-my-claudecode
- Developers already using Claude Code who want multi-agent workflows
- Teams experimenting with parallel AI agents on coding tasks
- People who want a prebuilt autopilot command for building features from a short description
- Users comfortable with Linux or macOS-style terminals and npm
planning-with-files
- Developers running long multi-step tasks in Claude Code or Codex CLI
- People who lose agent progress when the context window fills or is cleared
- Teams wanting a plan that lives in the project as plain markdown files
- Users of agents that support the Agent Skills standard
Strengths
oh-my-claudecode
- Installs as a Claude Code plugin through slash commands or as an npm CLI
- Provides both in-session slash commands and a terminal CLI with the same setup step
- Released under the permissive MIT license with an active repository and a large number of stars
planning-with-files
- Plain markdown files on disk that you can read, edit, and version-control or gitignore
- Works through the Agent Skills standard across many agents, with native plugins for several hosts
- MIT licensed with a published benchmark and install options via npm, the Claude Code marketplace, or npx
Not ideal for
oh-my-claudecode
- People who do not use Claude Code, since OMC is an add-on to it
- Users on environments without the flock utility who need named autopilot stage profiles, because those currently require Linux with flock
- Non-technical users who want a simple no-code tool, since setup involves slash commands, npm, and terminal use
planning-with-files
- Short one-off questions where a plan file adds overhead
- People who want a hosted service rather than local files in their repo
- Users of hosts not listed in the README, since native support depends on the host and results may vary
Trade-offs
oh-my-claudecode
- Named autopilot stage profiles currently require Linux with the flock utility, so other environments are limited to legacy autopilot
- npm may print a deprecation warning during CLI install that comes from an upstream dependency
- The README is long and relies on external documentation and a separate reference file for full detail
planning-with-files
- Benchmark figures are from the project's own measurements and are reported with stated limits; independent verification is not shown in the README
- Commands and tools vary by host, so the experience differs between integrations
- Session catchup modes can read local agent session records, which the README says requires an explicit opt-in
Getting started
oh-my-claudecode
Install the plugin from the Claude Code marketplace (run inside Claude Code, one line at a time)
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodeInstall the plugin (run inside Claude Code)
/plugin install oh-my-claudecodeplanning-with-files
Install the skill globally via npx skills
npx skills add OthmanAdi/planning-with-files --skill planning-with-files -gFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between oh-my-claudecode and planning-with-files?
oh-my-claudecode: Multi-agent orchestration layer for Claude Code, installed as a plugin or npm CLI. planning-with-files: A file-based planning skill that keeps AI coding agents on track across resets and crashes. oh-my-claudecode suits developers already using claude code who want multi-agent workflows, while planning-with-files suits developers running long multi-step tasks in claude code or codex cli.
Are oh-my-claudecode and planning-with-files free?
oh-my-claudecode: Free and open source. planning-with-files: Free and open source.
Which is easier to set up, oh-my-claudecode or planning-with-files?
planning-with-files is easier to get started with (rated beginner); oh-my-claudecode is rated intermediate and usually needs more setup.
Is oh-my-claudecode or planning-with-files more popular?
oh-my-claudecode has more GitHub stars (40.5k) than planning-with-files (27.8k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.
What are other alternatives to oh-my-claudecode and planning-with-files?
Other options people compare them with include OMX, wshobson/agents, oh-my-opencode-slim, ECC, Claude Code Game Studios.
Keep comparing
Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.