html.to.design vs Iconify
Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.
AI tool · Freemium
A Figma plugin that imports any website as editable Figma layers.
AI tool · Open source
An open-source collection of over 200,000 icons from many sets, with a Figma plugin and code components.
Our verdict
html.to.design and Iconify solve different problems, so they are not really rivals. html.to.design is a Figma plugin that turns a live website into editable Figma layers, which suits redesigns and capturing competitor pages, though the imported layer structure can be messy. Iconify is an open-source library of over 200,000 icons from many sets, with a Figma plugin and code components, aimed at finding icons and keeping them consistent across code and design.
Pick html.to.design if you want to bring an existing website into Figma as editable layers for a redesign or to study a competitor's page.
Pick Iconify if you need a large, free pool of icons across many sets for both Figma designs and code.
| Key difference | html.to.design | Iconify |
|---|---|---|
| Main purpose | Imports existing websites into Figma as editable layers. | Provides a large collection of icons for design and code. |
| Best for | Redesigning existing sites; capturing competitor pages. | Finding icons across many sets; consistent icons in code and Figma. |
| Price | Freemium. | Open source. |
| Works with | Figma and Chrome (Chrome extension for logged-in pages). | Figma and VS Code; web and API access. |
| Watch out for | Imported layer structure can be messy. | Check each icon set's licence before use. |
Written with AI from both products' catalogue entries · updated 2026-10-29
Who each one is for
Choose html.to.design if you need…
- Redesigning existing sites
- Capturing competitor pages
Choose Iconify if you need…
- Finding icons across many sets
- Consistent icons in code and Figma
Side-by-side
| html.to.design | Iconify | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Plugins & extensions · Figma plugins | Plugins & extensions · Figma plugins |
| Price | Freemium | Open source |
| Platforms | Figma, Chrome | Figma, Web, API |
| Works with | Figma, Chrome | Figma, VS Code |
| Hands-on tested by us | Not yet | Not yet |
| Last checked | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-29 |
What each one is
html.to.design
A Figma plugin that imports any website as editable Figma layers. Huge time saver for redesigns. Imported layer structure can be messy.
Iconify
An open-source collection of over 200,000 icons from many sets, with a Figma plugin and code components. Indispensable icon resource. Check each icon set's licence.
Best for
html.to.design
- Redesigning existing sites
- Capturing competitor pages
Iconify
- Finding icons across many sets
- Consistent icons in code and Figma
Strengths
html.to.design
- URL-to-Figma import
- Editable layers and styles
- Chrome extension for logged-in pages
Iconify
- Huge icon library
- Figma plugin
- Framework components
- Open source
Frequently asked questions
Should I use html.to.design or Iconify?
html.to.design and Iconify solve different problems, so they are not really rivals. html.to.design is a Figma plugin that turns a live website into editable Figma layers, which suits redesigns and capturing competitor pages, though the imported layer structure can be messy. Iconify is an open-source library of over 200,000 icons from many sets, with a Figma plugin and code components, aimed at finding icons and keeping them consistent across code and design. Pick html.to.design if you want to bring an existing website into Figma as editable layers for a redesign or to study a competitor's page. Pick Iconify if you need a large, free pool of icons across many sets for both Figma designs and code.
What is the difference between html.to.design and Iconify?
html.to.design: A Figma plugin that imports any website as editable Figma layers. Iconify: An open-source collection of over 200,000 icons from many sets, with a Figma plugin and code components. html.to.design suits redesigning existing sites, while Iconify suits finding icons across many sets.
Are html.to.design and Iconify free?
html.to.design: Freemium. Iconify: Open source.
What are other alternatives to html.to.design and Iconify?
Other options people compare them with include Stark.
Keep comparing
Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.