Skip to content

FunASR vs pyannote

Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.

FunASR

Open source · MIT

Open-source speech-to-text toolkit with streaming, voice detection, punctuation and speaker pipelines.

pyannote

Open source · MIT

Python toolkit for figuring out who spoke when in an audio recording, using pretrained PyTorch models.

The short answer

Choose FunASR if you need…

  • Developers who want to transcribe audio in Python with a pretrained model
  • Teams planning a move away from Whisper or a cloud ASR provider, who want to benchmark on their own audio
  • Builders who need live (streaming) transcription
  • Projects that need speaker-aware segments from recordings

Choose pyannote if you need…

  • Developers who want to add speaker separation to a Python audio workflow
  • Researchers comparing or fine-tuning speaker diarization models
  • Teams processing meeting or interview recordings who can run PyTorch code
  • Users who want a pretrained pipeline without training their own model

Side-by-side

FunASRpyannote
TypeLibraryLibrary
PriceFree and open sourceFree and open source
LicenceMITMIT
GitHub stars20.9k10.8k
Setup difficultyIntermediateIntermediate
How you get itInstall with a package managerInstall with a package manager
Main languagePythonJupyter Notebook
Last code update4 days ago12 days ago

What each one is

FunASR

FunASR is a toolkit for turning spoken audio into text. It bundles speech recognition models with helpers for detecting when someone is speaking, adding punctuation, and grouping segments by speaker, and it can be run from Python or served as an API. People use it to transcribe recordings or build live transcription, and the README says it supports offline, streaming, and edge deployment.

pyannote

pyannote.audio is an open-source Python toolkit for speaker diarization, which means splitting a recording into segments and labeling which speaker is talking at each point. It is built on PyTorch and ships with pretrained models and pipelines that can be fine-tuned on your own data. The README also describes a paid hosted service, pyannoteAI, as an optional premium option.

Best for

FunASR

  • Developers who want to transcribe audio in Python with a pretrained model
  • Teams planning a move away from Whisper or a cloud ASR provider, who want to benchmark on their own audio
  • Builders who need live (streaming) transcription
  • Projects that need speaker-aware segments from recordings

pyannote

  • Developers who want to add speaker separation to a Python audio workflow
  • Researchers comparing or fine-tuning speaker diarization models
  • Teams processing meeting or interview recordings who can run PyTorch code
  • Users who want a pretrained pipeline without training their own model

Strengths

FunASR

  • Covers several tasks in one toolkit: transcription, voice activity detection, punctuation, and speaker grouping
  • Provides a documented CPU path and a GPU path, plus a Colab quickstart for trying it without local setup
  • MIT licensed, with an active project and a README that spells out model-specific limits

pyannote

  • Built on PyTorch with pretrained pipelines available on the Hugging Face model hub
  • Python-first API with a short example that produces readable speaker turns
  • MIT licensed and actively maintained, with a latest release of 4.0.7 and a recent push

Not ideal for

FunASR

  • People who only need a point-and-click transcription app, since the README centers on Python and command-line-style setup
  • Users needing identification of named speakers, because speaker labels are anonymous indices within one recording
  • Anyone needing a language the chosen checkpoint does not cover, since language coverage varies by model

pyannote

  • People who need a no-code app: the README only shows Python code samples
  • Users who cannot accept the model conditions and Hugging Face token step, since the pretrained pipeline requires them
  • Anyone with no Python experience, because setup involves ffmpeg, a package install, and an access token

Trade-offs

FunASR

  • Capabilities differ by checkpoint and runtime, so choosing the right model takes reading the docs carefully
  • GPU use requires matching PyTorch and CUDA setup that the user must manage
  • Speaker outputs are local to a recording and are not identity recognition

pyannote

  • Pretrained pipelines require accepting user conditions and creating a Hugging Face access token before use
  • Benchmark numbers in the README come from the project itself and are not independently verified here
  • Some features and the fastest version point to the paid pyannoteAI service

Getting started

FunASR

Install PyTorch and torchaudio (CPU-only)

pip install torch torchaudio

Install FunASR

pip install funasr
Step-by-step guide: how to use FunASR

pyannote

Install with uv (recommended)

uv add pyannote.audio

Install with pip

pip install pyannote.audio
Step-by-step guide: how to use pyannote

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between FunASR and pyannote?

FunASR: Open-source speech-to-text toolkit with streaming, voice detection, punctuation and speaker pipelines. pyannote: Python toolkit for figuring out who spoke when in an audio recording, using pretrained PyTorch models. FunASR suits developers who want to transcribe audio in python with a pretrained model, while pyannote suits developers who want to add speaker separation to a python audio workflow.

Are FunASR and pyannote free?

FunASR: Free and open source. pyannote: Free and open source.

Is FunASR or pyannote more popular?

FunASR has more GitHub stars (20.9k) than pyannote (10.8k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.

What are other alternatives to FunASR and pyannote?

Other options people compare them with include Whisper, faster-whisper, whisper.cpp, Silero VAD, Spleeter.

Keep comparing

Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.