Flow vs Made With ML
Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.
Open source · MIT
A static type checker that finds type errors in JavaScript code before it runs.
Open source · MIT
A free course teaching how to build, deploy and maintain machine learning systems with code.
The short answer
Choose Flow if you need…
- JavaScript developers who want type checking without rewriting their code in another language
- Teams maintaining large JavaScript codebases that benefit from typed interfaces
- Developers on macOS, Linux, or Windows who want a prebuilt binary
- Developers who want to check code in an editor or in CI, as the README describes running the flow binary
Choose Made With ML if you need…
- Software engineers who want to learn how ML models get deployed and maintained
- Data scientists who build models but have not shipped them to production
- College graduates preparing for industry ML roles
- Product or leadership staff who want a technical foundation for ML projects
Side-by-side
| Flow | Made With ML | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dev tool | Learning resource |
| Price | Free and open source | Free and open source |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 22.3k | 49.9k |
| Setup difficulty | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| How you get it | Install with a package manager | Clone and build from source |
| Main language | Rust | Jupyter Notebook |
| Last code update | 4 days ago | 8 months ago |
What each one is
Flow
Flow is a static typechecker for JavaScript, developed by Meta. It reads JavaScript code that has type annotations and reports mismatches, such as passing the wrong kind of value to a function, without running the code. Developers use it to catch bugs earlier and to make large JavaScript codebases easier to understand and change.
Made With ML
Made With ML is a hands-on course, delivered as a GitHub repository of notebooks and Python scripts, that walks through taking a machine learning model from experiment to production. It covers design, development, deployment and iteration, with an emphasis on software engineering practices like testing, logging and serving. The README says the code is meant to run on a personal laptop or on Anyscale clusters.
Best for
Flow
- JavaScript developers who want type checking without rewriting their code in another language
- Teams maintaining large JavaScript codebases that benefit from typed interfaces
- Developers on macOS, Linux, or Windows who want a prebuilt binary
- Developers who want to check code in an editor or in CI, as the README describes running the flow binary
Made With ML
- Software engineers who want to learn how ML models get deployed and maintained
- Data scientists who build models but have not shipped them to production
- College graduates preparing for industry ML roles
- Product or leadership staff who want a technical foundation for ML projects
Strengths
Flow
- Developed and maintained by Meta with a large community and about 22,000 GitHub stars
- Prebuilt binaries are provided for major platforms, so installation does not require building from source
- Released under the permissive MIT license
Made With ML
- Free and open source under the MIT license, with a large community of learners (the README cites 40K+ subscribers)
- Covers the full lifecycle from experimentation to deployment and iteration in one project
- Code is organized into clear modules, making it easy to see how the pieces connect
Not ideal for
Flow
- Projects that already standardized on TypeScript and its tooling, since switching costs time and Flow has a different ecosystem (reason: the README does not compare the two)
- Beginners with no JavaScript experience, since the tool assumes familiarity with type annotations (reason: the README gives little introductory material and links to external docs)
- People who want to build Flow themselves on an unsupported platform, since the README lists only macOS arm64, Linux x86_64 and arm64, and Windows x86_64 (reason: limited platform list)
Made With ML
- People looking only for theory or math, since the README emphasizes practical building over derivations
- Anyone wanting a ready-made production app to use directly, since this is a teaching project
- Beginners with no Python experience, because the course assumes working knowledge of Python and ML concepts
Trade-offs
Flow
- The README is truncated and gives few concrete usage examples; detailed setup is delegated to flow.org
- Building from source requires a nightly Rust toolchain and, for the JavaScript build, Emscripten, Node, and Yarn
- The README mentions a Rust port in progress, so parts of the build process may change
Made With ML
- Setup is more involved than a typical notebook; the README gives separate local and Anyscale instructions and cloud compute is suggested for speed
- Much of the detailed walkthrough lives on the external course site, so the repository alone may not explain everything
- The README is truncated and does not show every step, so some setup details are unclear from the text provided
Getting started
Flow
Install nightly Rust toolchain (build from source)
rustup toolchain install nightlyBuild the Rust workspace
cd rust_port && cargo +nightly buildMade With ML
Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/GokuMohandas/Made-With-ML.git .Create and activate a virtual environment (local)
python3 -m venv venv # recommend using Python 3.10Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Flow and Made With ML?
Flow: A static type checker that finds type errors in JavaScript code before it runs. Made With ML: A free course teaching how to build, deploy and maintain machine learning systems with code. Flow suits javascript developers who want type checking without rewriting their code in another language, while Made With ML suits software engineers who want to learn how ml models get deployed and maintained.
Are Flow and Made With ML free?
Flow: Free and open source. Made With ML: Free and open source.
Is Flow or Made With ML more popular?
Made With ML has more GitHub stars (49.9k) than Flow (22.3k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.
Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.