Skip to content

Bruno vs Yaak

Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.

Bruno

Open source · MIT

Free, offline-first desktop app for exploring and testing APIs, storing collections as files.

Yaak

Open source · MIT

A desktop app for sending and organizing API requests across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket and SSE.

The short answer

Choose Bruno if you need…

  • Developers who want to test HTTP or GraphQL APIs without an account or cloud sync
  • Teams that already keep code in Git and want API collections stored alongside it
  • People who want to run API test collections in CI/CD using the Bruno CLI
  • Users who care about keeping API data on their own device

Choose Yaak if you need…

  • Developers who want a desktop client for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket or SSE in one place
  • Teams that want request collections stored as files they can version in Git
  • People who want to import existing collections from Postman, Insomnia, OpenAPI or Curl
  • Users who prefer keeping secrets in their OS keychain rather than in a cloud account

Side-by-side

BrunoYaak
TypeAppApp
PriceFree and open sourceFree and open source
LicenceMITMIT
GitHub stars48k19.4k
Setup difficultyBeginnerBeginner
How you get itDownload the appDownload the app
Main languageJavaScriptTypeScript
Last code update4 days ago4 days ago

What each one is

Bruno

Bruno is a desktop app for sending requests to APIs and checking the responses, similar in purpose to Postman or Insomnia. It saves your request collections as plain-text files in a folder on your computer, so they can be versioned with Git and shared like any other project files. The README states it is offline-only and has no plans for cloud sync.

Yaak

Yaak is a desktop application for testing and working with APIs, the way web and mobile software talks to servers. You can build requests over several protocols, including REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket and Server-Sent Events, and group them into workspaces and folders. The README describes it as offline-first and privacy-focused, with no telemetry, and it is built with Tauri, Rust and React.

Best for

Bruno

  • Developers who want to test HTTP or GraphQL APIs without an account or cloud sync
  • Teams that already keep code in Git and want API collections stored alongside it
  • People who want to run API test collections in CI/CD using the Bruno CLI
  • Users who care about keeping API data on their own device

Yaak

  • Developers who want a desktop client for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket or SSE in one place
  • Teams that want request collections stored as files they can version in Git
  • People who want to import existing collections from Postman, Insomnia, OpenAPI or Curl
  • Users who prefer keeping secrets in their OS keychain rather than in a cloud account

Strengths

Bruno

  • Collections are stored as plain files, which works well with Git and other version control
  • Works offline and keeps data on the local device, per the README
  • Available for Mac, Windows and Linux, with the CLI usable in automated pipelines

Yaak

  • Covers many protocols (REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, SSE) in a single desktop app
  • Stores data locally and mirrors workspaces to files, which suits Git-based workflows
  • The source code is MIT licensed and can be built for free

Not ideal for

Bruno

  • Teams that need cloud-synced collections across machines, since the README says Bruno is offline-only and has no plans for cloud sync
  • People looking for a hosted service with built-in team dashboards, as the README describes Bruno as a local tool with paid versions for extra features

Yaak

  • People who need cloud sync or real-time team collaboration, since the README emphasizes offline use and filesystem mirroring rather than cloud features
  • Anyone needing a commercial license without cost: the README says prebuilt binaries are free for personal use but require a license for commercial use
  • Non-developers with no exposure to APIs, since the tool assumes you know what requests and endpoints are

Trade-offs

Bruno

  • The README does not describe the full feature set, so specific capabilities need checking in the documentation
  • Cloud sync and team hosting are not offered; the README points to paid versions for additional features
  • The README is truncated, so details on paid tiers and edge-case behavior are unclear

Yaak

  • Prebuilt binaries require a paid license for commercial use, per the README's pricing terms
  • Community contributions are currently limited to bug fixes, according to the contribution policy
  • The README is truncated and does not detail every feature, so some capabilities may be unverified here

Getting started

Bruno

Install on Mac via Homebrew

brew install bruno

Install the Bruno CLI from npm

npm install -g @usebruno/cli
Step-by-step guide: how to use Bruno

Yaak

Download the app for your platform

Download from https://yaak.app/download
Step-by-step guide: how to use Yaak

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Bruno and Yaak?

Bruno: Free, offline-first desktop app for exploring and testing APIs, storing collections as files. Yaak: A desktop app for sending and organizing API requests across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket and SSE. Bruno suits developers who want to test http or graphql apis without an account or cloud sync, while Yaak suits developers who want a desktop client for rest, graphql, grpc, websocket or sse in one place.

Are Bruno and Yaak free?

Bruno: Free and open source. Yaak: Free and open source.

Is Bruno or Yaak more popular?

Bruno has more GitHub stars (48k) than Yaak (19.4k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.

What are other alternatives to Bruno and Yaak?

Other options people compare them with include Hoppscotch, Scalar, AI Website Cloner.

Keep comparing

Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.