Skip to content

assistant-ui vs OpenUI

Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.

assistant-ui

Open source · MIT

A TypeScript/React library for building AI chat interfaces in your app.

OpenUI

Open source · MIT

Open standard and toolkit for AI models to generate and stream live user interfaces.

The short answer

Choose assistant-ui if you need…

  • React or Next.js developers adding an AI chat panel to an existing app
  • Teams that want to style chat UI with their own design system or shadcn/ui
  • Developers who need tool-call rendering or inline human approval in a chat
  • Projects already using the Vercel AI SDK or LangGraph

Choose OpenUI if you need…

  • Developers adding AI-generated charts, forms, or tables to a web app
  • Teams building chat assistants or copilots that answer with interactive UI
  • React developers who want prebuilt chat layouts and component libraries
  • Developers using LangChain or LangGraph agents that stream through AG-UI

Side-by-side

assistant-uiOpenUI
TypeLibraryFramework
PriceFree and open sourceFree and open source
LicenceMITMIT
GitHub stars12.9k14.7k
Setup difficultyIntermediateIntermediate
How you get itInstall with a package managerInstall with a package manager
Main languageTypeScriptTypeScript
Last code update4 days ago4 days ago

What each one is

assistant-ui

assistant-ui is an open-source TypeScript and React library for building chat interfaces like ChatGPT inside your own web app. It provides composable chat pieces such as threads, messages, and a composer, and connects them to backends like the Vercel AI SDK, LangGraph, or your own custom backend.

OpenUI

OpenUI is a framework for building interfaces that an AI model generates on the fly. It defines a compact language, OpenUI Lang, that a model streams as it writes, and a renderer that turns that stream into live UI in React, Vue, Svelte, or Angular. You define a set of components, and OpenUI builds the instructions that tell the model which components it may use.

Best for

assistant-ui

  • React or Next.js developers adding an AI chat panel to an existing app
  • Teams that want to style chat UI with their own design system or shadcn/ui
  • Developers who need tool-call rendering or inline human approval in a chat
  • Projects already using the Vercel AI SDK or LangGraph

OpenUI

  • Developers adding AI-generated charts, forms, or tables to a web app
  • Teams building chat assistants or copilots that answer with interactive UI
  • React developers who want prebuilt chat layouts and component libraries
  • Developers using LangChain or LangGraph agents that stream through AG-UI

Strengths

assistant-ui

  • Composable primitives let you build custom chat layouts instead of using one fixed component
  • Includes streaming, attachments, markdown, and accessibility features according to the README
  • Typed TypeScript APIs for runtimes, tool schemas, and message parts

OpenUI

  • MIT licensed and open source, with a published package set for several frontends
  • Claims up to 67% fewer tokens than JSON for the same output (a figure from the README, not independently verified here)
  • Streams output progressively, so the UI updates as the model writes

Not ideal for

assistant-ui

  • People who want a finished chat app without writing any code, since it is a library for developers
  • Projects not using React, because the library is built for React and TypeScript
  • Teams that need a single drop-in component with no customization, since the README describes composing primitives instead

OpenUI

  • People who only need a plain chatbot with text replies, since the project is built around generated UI
  • Teams not using a supported frontend (React, Vue, Svelte, Angular) without extra integration work
  • Anyone who needs a fully proven production track record, since the README does not describe production deployments

Trade-offs

assistant-ui

  • Requires React and TypeScript knowledge, so it is not beginner-friendly for non-developers
  • The README is truncated and does not fully document every backend or setup detail
  • Being a library, you still need to supply and pay for your own model provider and backend

OpenUI

  • The README is a broad overview; detailed API docs live on the external docs site
  • Many packages and integrations make the right starting point unclear for newcomers
  • Output quality depends on the model and on how well the component library is defined

Getting started

assistant-ui

Create a new project with the CLI

npx assistant-ui@latest create

Add to an existing project with the CLI

npx assistant-ui@latest init
Step-by-step guide: how to use assistant-ui

OpenUI

Scaffold a new chat app

npx @openuidev/cli@latest create --name genui-chat-app
Step-by-step guide: how to use OpenUI

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between assistant-ui and OpenUI?

assistant-ui: A TypeScript/React library for building AI chat interfaces in your app. OpenUI: Open standard and toolkit for AI models to generate and stream live user interfaces. assistant-ui suits react or next.js developers adding an ai chat panel to an existing app, while OpenUI suits developers adding ai-generated charts, forms, or tables to a web app.

Are assistant-ui and OpenUI free?

assistant-ui: Free and open source. OpenUI: Free and open source.

Is assistant-ui or OpenUI more popular?

OpenUI has more GitHub stars (14.7k) than assistant-ui (12.9k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.

What are other alternatives to assistant-ui and OpenUI?

Other options people compare them with include CopilotKit, shadcn/ui, Radix Primitives, Base UI, LangChain.

Keep comparing

Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.